There remains uncertainty over the relevance of experience and management capabilities to solve transfer problems related to knowledge differences. 2002; Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios 2016; Morandi 2013; Wallin et al. In ideal circumstances during deep collaboration the industrial partner would take a more equal role as the academics and contribute to the identification of research problems, help with the selection of methods and is engaged in data gathering and analysis. The U.S. Charter School Landscape: Extant Literature, Gaps in Research Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. 3(4), 285302. It has a strong relationship with causal ambiguity, as it also strongly depends on a shared knowledge base (Cohen and Levinthal 1990). (2004). We also identified the most relevant factors and practices for the mitigation of these differences. We noticed that cultural differences is used as an aggregated term for different goals, organizational and managerial differences and epistemic norms. A highly valued academic norm is academic freedom, the autonomy to follow interesting directions and choose ones own research problems and methods. (2000) and Hagedoorn (2002) concluded that there was a lack of research into transfer channels other than commercialization. Universitiesindustry collaboration: A literature review. We found that research into knowledge transfer in academic engagement is dispersed. International Journal of Technology Management, Disclaimer. This is in contrast with the findings of Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa (2015), who argue that UI collaborations are managed as rational process: focusing on planned resource and knowledge transfer. While Muscio and Pozzali (2013) and Morandi (2013) found that more experience in interaction with firms does not change the perception of cognitive distance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Knowledge transfer through effective universityindustry interactions: Empirical experiences from china. R&D Management, 0000019218 00000 n In the initiation stage trust is mainly based on the reputation of and previous experiences with the partner (Plewa et al. Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1998). The next step was to analyse the papers we selected. trailer 2013). The paucity of extant data in GT studies is of concern as is the dearth of literature on methods of preparing extant data for analysis in GT studies. Background: 30(12), 13911418. It is noted that FinTech is in its nascent phase and is undergoing continuous development and implementation through product and process innovation, disruption and transformation. (1994). And what practices facilitate the transfer of knowledge in academic engagement? PDF DOING A LITERATURE 3 REVIEW - SAGE Publications Inc This allows us to emphasize social interactions, managerial aspects and concrete activities that enhance knowledge transfer. Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Web. What does extant literature mean? - Definitions.net Research Policy, This is also confirmed by the papers in our review, which show a very informal management style, based on high levels of trust. This complicates collaboration because different languages, opinions, social behaviours, norms and beliefs make the interpretation of behaviour and knowledge more difficult (Lane and Lubatkin 1998; Mowery and Shane 2002; Simonin 1999). Review of International Comparative Management/Revista De Management Comparat International, 2007; Thune 2009). Introduction to the special issue on university entrepreneurship and technology transfer. We have provided experience-based information in . Steinmo, M. (2015). Balancing diversity in innovation networks: Trading zones in universityindustry R&D collaboration. 10(1), 173187. There are not many papers that focus explicitly on knowledge transfer in academic engagement (Bruneel et al. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). The second, with differences in goals and the applicability of knowledge. Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. J. P., & Lyles, M. A. Production Planning and Control, Though there is no well-defined process to find a gap in existing knowledge, your curiosity, creativity, imagination, and judgment can help you identify it. The paper summarizes lessons that could be of significance for FinTech users, producers, entrepreneurs, investors, policy designers and regulators. These differences can be handled through publication management and upfront arrangement of IP (intellectual property) rights (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015). Tie strength improves absorptive capacity, as more interaction provides more opportunities to exchange knowledge. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Similarity in knowledge backgrounds makes it easier to understand and absorb new knowledge that results from the collaboration. (1994). First, we prepared a table which summarized the research questions and answers. %PDF-1.5 % Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. =FHu$ktrksWw=SA>=TAecWvpXd$84*]vS 2014). Qualitative research in this field is often very descriptive and does not refer to theoretical concepts. Although cognitive distance does not diminish the propensity to collaborate, it does limit interaction during the collaboration. 2013). Tel: 914-674-7350; Fax: 914-674-7351; Web site: http://ger.mercy.edu. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the findings, reviewed for policymakers and researchers, and a list of remaining research topics in the field of charter school research. 20(7), 595623. PDF The U.S. Charter School Landscape: Extant Literature, Gaps in Research Ancient literature comprises religious and scientific documents, tales, poetry and plays, royal edicts and declarations, and other forms of writing that were recorded on a variety of media, including stone, clay tablets, papyri, palm leaves, and metal. Boundary spanners are often personnel that is exchanged between academia and industry during the course of the collaboration. A second difficulty of the literature review process stems from the fact that it is not a linear process (Onwuegbuzie & Frels, 2016). Liyanage, S., & Mitchell, H. (1994). Communication practices on the other hand are very important for the quality of knowledge sharing. 1998; Santoro and Gopalakrishnan 2001). Philosophy, 2011) and is valued higher by industry (Cohen 2002), researchers into universityindustry interactions have ignored these forms of collaborations for a long time. Such knowledge is often transferred through contractual agreements, like patents (Alexander and Childe 2013; Sandberg et al. We developed a methodology that overall followed the analytical process of a systematic review but differs from other systematic reviews when it comes to searching and identifying relevant literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, Cohen, W. M. (2002). 5(1), 1437. 38(2), 124. The author attempts to conceptualize the terms of impairment to the phonological loop in a working memory. Given that these factors relate to differences in knowledge background and the complexity of knowledge we included all research that discussed differences in knowledge background and knowledge characteristics. The evolution of universityindustry linkagesA framework. Thereafter, it identifies the gaps and provides directions for further research. McCabe, A., Parker, R., & Cox, S. (2016). Trust and tie-strength were identified as important facilitators. 2001; Philbin 2008; Plewa et al. Academy of Management Journal, In adopting this focus we follow a developing interest in organization science that seeks a detailed understanding of what is actually done, or the micro-level, and how to make sense of those activities (Nicolini 2009). Journal of Knowledge Management, Additionally, academic knowledge and expertise is valued higher than industrial knowledge. Philbin, S. (2008). Accessibility (2004). 2013b). 2002). Systematic Reviews, 2011; Hadjimanolis 2006; McCabe et al. startxref Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. We could also compare previous research outcomes and draw new conclusions by connecting empirical results with theoretical explanations and by identifying dissimilarities that require more research. The main purpose of a review article is to critically analyse the extant literature in a given research area, theme or discipline, identifying relevant theories, key constructs, empirical methods, contexts, and remaining research gaps in order to set a future research agenda based on those gaps. Ulhi, J., Neergaard, H., & Bjerregaard, T. (2012). If partners mainly interact through periodical meetings instead of personnel exchange the identification of suitable recipients within the firm, who have the right knowledge background is essential. RayyanA web and mobile app for systematic reviews. STANDS4 LLC, 2023. Ghauri and Rosendo-Rios (2016) found that especially market and time orientation affect collaboration success. Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. 0000135631 00000 n 2011, Hadjimanolis 2006; Wallin et al. In collaborations with low engagement the firm is seen as data source, while all research activities are controlled and conducted by the academic partner. Doctoral students on the universityindustry interface: A review of the literature. Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. The extant literature provides examples of adolescent dialect use for comparison as well. 163 33 2013b; Steinmo 2015). The role of experience to mitigate differences in knowledge background remains unclear. 22(5), 14971511. %%EOF (2008) provided an interesting starting point for a more focused analysis, and integration of concepts. Second, we identified the information that related to knowledge transfer and included this in our table. Purpose. 2014). MeSH Sandberg, J., Holmstrm, J., Napier, N., & Levn, P. (2015). J Technol Transf 44, 12361255 (2019). You may be able to access this content by logging in via your Emerald profile. To which Daghfouss (2004) adds that systematic learning in relation to management skills does not significantly increase learning capabilities. The role of relational trust in banksmall firm relationships. 18(3), 282306. 2014). be extrapolated from extant literature because, as we discuss in Section II, the literature does not agree whether auditors are punished or rewarded for GAAP-related failures. The importance of social capital (trust and tie strength) has been confirmed for academic engagement (Amabile et al. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. (2013), but we did not find relevant papers in this period. We start with a general discussion on knowledge flows in academic engagement. Accessed 1 May. (2016) found that such routine based differences, meaning dissimilarities in working methods, could only be resolved when orientation based differences, meaning dissimilarities in goals, were settled. 5, 210. Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. 2013a, b). Simonin, B. Yet the trust scales used most frequently in the papers we reviewed are the ones intended for analysing business-to-business relations, developed by Saparito et al. Industry and academia in convergence: Micro-institutional dimensions of R&D collaboration. Wang, Y., & Lu, L. (2007). Academicpractitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. We started our review with identifying barriers and facilitators of knowledge transfer. Therefore, relatedness of prior knowledge and technological competence help to understand and integrate new knowledge (Daghfous 2004; Santoro and Bierly 2006) and reduces ambiguity. Organizational cross-cultural differences in the context of innovation-oriented partnerships. If the abstract was unclear about the content, the decision to include a paper was made after scanning the whole paper. 2012; Wang and Lu 2007). This, however, did not provide many useful results. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on universityindustry relations. 14(3), 207222. Bloedon, R. V., & Stokes, D. R. (1994). 56, 8696. 0 Trust results in less formal contractual agreements (Chin et al. These plans are rarely updated as the work develops and they soon become obsolete. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we 2015; Ulhi et al. European Journal of Innovation Management, 35(1), 128152. 2016). Drawing up project plans and the use of management tools can help to make differences in goals visible over the course of the project. Beyond unidirectional knowledge transfer: An empirical study of trust-based universityindustry research and technology collaboration. 19(5), 461477. 0000188193 00000 n A good understanding of a partners needs helps to take these needs into account, also when novel directions are pursued, while open communication raises understanding. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). 2). This helps to integrate the results of the research (McCabe et al. 25(2), 162179. 2014; Plewa et al. The site is secure. Collaboration experience with a specific partner and learning how to deal with differences seems the best way to overcome differences in logic and goals. Looking at the papers in our review, the overall picture is that the extant literature pays little attention to the knowledge contribution of industrial partners. Research Policy, Using extant literature in a grounded theory study: a personal - PubMed ^,O^bT RaJqlxar7[Kpk['fr Lg!&W$~$UU2bOxr}!a)F@~P^._Up/DQ0@xl9mGBF)%2?81S GC+- Journal of Management Studies, Most of this research studied academic entrepreneurship (Agrawal 2001; Shane 2005), which includes patenting, licensing, joint ventures, spin-offs and so forth. Part of Springer Nature. We found that cognitive differences are hard to overcome without the presences of boundary spanners or intermediaries. Making university/industry collaborative research succeed. These factors and their definitions (see below) were used to decide which of the papers on academic engagement in our results discussed topics that could be related to knowledge transfer. Industry and Innovation, The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Zhu, F., & Hawk, S. (2015). Chin, C. M. M., Yap, E. H., & Spowage, A. C. (2011). 46(2), 369382. Finally, the study highlights the lessons that growing FinTech firms and their regulators can learn from the experiences of their counterparts across the globe. If you think you should have access to this content, click to contact our support team. Also, providing the industrial partner the possibility to delay the publication to arrange IP rights reduces this barrier (Hadjimanolis 2006). The knowledge contribution from the industrial partner is reduced to formulating interesting research problems (DEste and Perkmann 2011; McCabe et al. Also, academics hardly use data that is produced by the industrial partner due to a lack of quality signals of industrial data that is required for academic publication (Canhoto et al. This requires bidirectional knowledge sharing to identify relevant problems, share and develop new insights, and the transfer and implementation of knowledge or technology. Project management tools can be helpful in the communication of progress and the relation between goals and outcomes (Wallin et al. The need to go through the whole knowledge cycle in both phases distinguishes collaborative research from other learning processes. 20(3), 272285. Send us feedback about these examples. Regular contact during the collaboration is important to ensure that goals remain aligned (Buganza et al. We used the following academic databases: Emerald, Web of Knowledge and Business Source Premier. PMC Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Cyert, R. M., & Goodman, P. S. (1997). Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., Macpherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013b). Additionally, trust is reflected in the absence of formal control mechanisms. (Department of Finance and General Business. Morandi, V. (2013). 1 May 2023. This means that we will focus on research partnerships, collaborative research, contract research and consulting while collaborations with limited interaction or that require little or no new research are excluded. Muscio, A., & Pozzali, A. This way they manage to secure industrial funding. We searched in: titles, keywords and abstracts using the terms: Universitybusiness, universityindustry academic engagement and research partnership (other terms for university such as Academ* and Higher Education science did not yield additional results), combined with one of the terms collaborat*, cooperation*, partnership*, engage*, relation* research alliance*. Reduced ambiguity in return improves absorptive capacity and the understanding of the goals and needs of the partner. Financial technology: a review of extant literature - Emerald Boundary spanners are effective because they facilitate the knowledge conversion and translation of academics results to the context of the firm and vice versa (Azevedo Ferreira and Rezende Ramos 2015; Gertner et al. 35(7), 975993. 2000). et al. 0000002106 00000 n This could be due to a difference in focus, as Ankrah and AL-Tabbaa (2015) focus on negotiations in the pre-collaboration phase and their data included many results related to academic entrepreneurship, while the papers we analysed focus on the execution of the project and research partnerships. qbl=[P1\Gu6/a *y.lm*9;]/7!6k 5 ne*~1W'm$= T&;zDqp!q6GsF6>{GQUb#N`M>WR:ekR'U}gcc8A]&$iGCT"O^hl;+% There is room left for research into problem management during the initiation and collaboration phase. Absorptive capacity refers to the ability to recognize, assimilate and apply new external knowledge (Cohen and Levinthal 1990). Academy of Management Journal,
L'osteria Menu Calories,
Best All Inclusive Resorts In Belize,
Articles E
